| |||||||||||||||
| Both CAST/EiJ and CASA/RkJ (Stock No. 000735) were derived from wild mice trapped in Thailand. Wild-derived mice are genetically distinct from common laboratory mice for a number of complex phenotypic characteristics and are valuable tools for genetic mapping, evolution and systematics research. | |||||||||||||||
Former Names Castaneus Eicher (Changed: 15-DEC-04 ) Type Inbred Strain; Additional information on Inbred Strains. Type Wild-Derived; Additional information on Wild-Derived Mice. Visit our online Nomenclature tutorial. Mating System Sibling x Sibling (Female x Male) 01-MAR-06 Breeding Considerations This strain is a challenging breeder. Species M. m. castaneus Generation F90pF104 (17-SEP-12)
Generation DefinitionsGeographic Origin Thailand
View larger imageAppearance
agouti
Related Genotype: A/ADescription
Both CAST/EiJ and CASA/RkJ (Stock No. 000735) were derived from wild mice trapped in Thailand. CAST is often combined with the common laboratory strains to generate F1 hybrids with high levels of heterozygosity for use in genetic mapping. Unlike the wild-derived strain SPRET, male F1 mice from a CAST cross are fertile.Like CASA, CAST is resistant to flavivirus infection. The flavivirus family includes pathogens responsible for dengue, yellow fever and several forms of encephalitis. Most common laboratory mice are sensitive to flavivirus infection. Resistance/sensitivity is conferred through the oligoA synthase Oas1b locus. In a comparison of multiple strains, CASA and CAST exhibit reduced numbers of retinal ganglion cells as compared to common laboratory strains and other wild-derived strains.
Wild-derived mice are genetically distinct from common laboratory mice for a number of complex phenotypic characteristics and are valuable tools for genetic mapping, evolution and systematics research.
Development
The founders were trapped in a grain warehouse, in Thonburi, Thailand by Dr. Joseph T Marshall, and mice were sent to Dr. Vernon Chapman and Dr. Frank Ruddle at Yale University, and, from there, to Dr. Eva Eicher and Dr. Thomas Roderick at The Jackson Laboratory in 1971. Dr. Eicher's colony were maintained by inbreeding to generate CAST/Ei and Dr. Roderick's colony were maintained by inbreeding to generate CASA/Rk and CASB/Rk. (Roderick, 1982; Chapman and Ruddle, 1972.)
Strains carrying Ahrd allele
000690 129P3/J 000648 AKR/J 008599 B6.Cg-Cyp1a2/Cyp1a1tm2Dwn Ahrd Tg(CYP1A1,CYP1A2)1Dwn/DwnJ 002921 B6.D2N-Ahrd/J 000652 BDP/J 000671 DBA/2J 000674 I/LnJ 000675 LG/J 000676 LP/J 000684 NZB/BlNJ 000726 RBF/DnJ 000682 RF/J 000686 SJL/J 000688 ST/bJ 000689 SWR/J 000693 WC/ReJ KitlSl/J 000933 YBR/EiJ View Strains carrying Ahrd (17 strains)
Strains carrying Oas1bFlv-r allele
000735 CASA/RkJ View Strains carrying Oas1bFlv-r (1 strain)
Strains carrying other alleles of Ahr
000645 A/HeJ 000646 A/J 002920 B6(D2N).Spretus-Ahrb-3/J 006203 B6.129(FVB)-Ahrtm3.1Bra/J 002831 B6.129-Ahrtm1Bra/J 000130 B6.C-H17c/(HW14)ByJ 000136 B6.C-H34c/(HW22)ByJ 000370 B6.C-H38c/(HW119)ByJ 002727 B6;129-Ahrtm1Bra/J 001026 BALB/cByJ 000653 BUB/BnJ 000659 C3H/HeJ 000663 C57BL/6By 001139 C57BL/6ByJ 000664 C57BL/6J 000662 C57BLKS/J 000667 C57BR/cdJ 000668 C57L/J 000669 C58/J 000926 CAROLI/EiJ 000656 CBA/J 000657 CE/J 000351 CXB1/ByJ 000352 CXB2/ByJ 000353 CXB3/ByJ 000354 CXB4/ByJ 000355 CXB5/ByJ 000356 CXB6/ByJ 000357 CXB7/ByJ 002937 D2.B6-Ahrb-1/J 000673 HRS/J 000677 MA/MyJ 000550 MOLF/EiJ 000679 P/J 000930 PERA/EiJ 000644 SEA/GnJ 000280 SF/CamEiJ 001146 SPRET/EiJ View Strains carrying other alleles of Ahr (38 strains)
JAX® NOTES, Winter 1994; 456. Differences between CASA/Rk and CAST/Ei.
JAX® NOTES, Winter 1995; 460. Wild-Derived Mice Strains - Tips on Their Care and Handling.
JAX® NOTES, Winter 2006; 504. JAX® Mice: the Gold Standard Just Got Better.
Mouse Phenome Database / SNP Facility
Sequence data is available from the Mouse Genomes Project at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
View Phenotypic Data
Phenotypic Data
Mouse Phenome Database
View Research Applications
Research Applications
This mouse can be used to support research in many areas including:
Ahrd relatedResearch Tools
Genetics Research
Evolution and Systematics Research
Gene Mapping
Gene Mapping: Polymorphisms
Research Tools
Toxicology Research
| Allele Symbol | Ahrd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Allele Name | d variant | ||
| Allele Type | Not Applicable | ||
| Common Name(s) | Ahd; Ahk; AhRd; Ahhn; ah; in; | ||
| Gene Symbol and Name | Ahr, aryl-hydrocarbon receptor | ||
| Chromosome | 12 | ||
| Gene Common Name(s) | Ah; Ahh; Ahre; In; aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness; aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase; bHLHe76; dioxin receptor; inflammatory reactivity; | ||
| General Note |
Compared with Ahrd/Ahrd mice, Ahrb/Ahrb individuals have a high inflammatory response to cutaneous application of dimethylbenzanthracene; a high susceptibility to methylcholanthrene- and benzopyrene-induced subcutaneous sarcomas and methylcholanthrene-induced lung tumors; an increased resistance to zoxazolamine-induced paralysis, lindane toxicity, and benzo[a]pyrene-induced aplastic anemia and leukemia; a high susceptibility to acetaminophen-induced hepatic necrosis and cataract formation; and an increased susceptibility to polycyclic hydrocarbon-induced birth defects, stillbirths, resorptions, decreased body weight, ovarian primordial oocyte depletion, and spermatozoal aberrations (J:5822). The Ahrballele is associated with increases in numerous metabolites of chemical carcinogens binding to DNA nucleotides (J:12156). The effectiveness of several mutagens for Salmonella in vitro is enhanced by presence of a liver fraction from Ahrb/Ahrb> mice treated with polycyclic hydrocarbons, but not from similarly treated Ahrd/Ahr Strain of origin - this allele was found in DBA/2J, AKR/J, 129, SWR, RF, NZB strains | ||
| Molecular Note | This allele encodes a 104 kDa receptor that is stabilized by molybdate and has an affinity for ligand 10-100 fold lower than that of the receptor produced by the C57BL/6J allele. PCR sequencing of cDNA revealed ten nucleotide differences between the coding sequences of the DBA/2J and C57BL/6J receptors. Five of the ten differences would cause amino acid changes. One of these, an apparent T to C transition replaces the opal termination codon in the C57BL/6J allele with an arginine codon in the DBA/2J allele. This change would extend translation of the DBA/2J mRNA by 43 amino acids, accounting for the larger size of the peptide produced by this allele (104 kDa vs 95 kDa for the C57BL/6J allele). A second T to C transition changes a leucine codon in the C57BL/6J allele to a proline codon in the DBA/2J allele, and would likely change secondary structure of the peptide and thus ligand affinity. [MGI Ref ID J:15153] [MGI Ref ID J:17460] [MGI Ref ID J:22144] | ||
| Allele Symbol | Oas1bFlv-r | ||
| Allele Name | flavivirus resistance | ||
| Allele Type | Spontaneous | ||
| Common Name(s) | Flvr; | ||
| Strain of Origin | various | ||
| Gene Symbol and Name | Oas1b, 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 1B | ||
| Chromosome | 5 | ||
| Gene Common Name(s) | 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 2; Flavivirus resistance; Flv; L1; Mmu-L1; Oias-2; Oias2; West Nile virus; Wnv; flavivirus resistance; | ||
| General Note |
The majority of mouse strains carry the susceptibility allele. Only the Det, BSVR, BRVR, CASA/RK, CAST/Ei, and PRI carry the resistance allele. The MOLD/Rk strain carried the allele for minor resistance. Genbank ID for this allele: AF481734 | ||
| Molecular Note | This allele confers resistance to flavivirus infection. [MGI Ref ID J:77001] | ||
Wild-derived inbred mouse strains are maintained through sibling (sister x brother) matings; no genotyping required.
Genotyping resources and troubleshooting
Petkov PM; Cassell MA; Sargent EE; Donnelly CJ; Robinson P; Crew V; Asquith S; Haar RV; Wiles MV. 2004. Development of a SNP genotyping panel for genetic monitoring of the laboratory mouse. Genomics 83(5):902-11. [PubMed: 15081119] [MGI Ref ID J:89298]
Ideraabdullah FY; de la Casa-Esperon E; Bell TA; Detwiler DA; Magnuson T; Sapienza C; de Villena FP. 2004. Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains. Genome Res 14(10A):1880-7. [PubMed: 15466288] [MGI Ref ID J:193384]
Keane TM; Goodstadt L; Danecek P; White MA; Wong K; Yalcin B; Heger A; Agam A; Slater G; Goodson M; Furlotte NA; Eskin E; Nellaker C; Whitley H; Cleak J; Janowitz D; Hernandez-Pliego P; Edwards A; Belgard TG; Oliver PL; McIntyre RE; Bhomra A; Nicod J; Gan X; Yuan W; van der Weyden L; Steward CA; Bala S; Stalker J; Mott R; Durbin R; Jackson IJ; Czechanski A; Guerra-Assuncao JA; Donahue LR; Reinholdt LG; Payseur BA; Ponting CP; Birney E; Flint J; Adams DJ. 2011. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477(7364):289-94. [PubMed: 21921910] [MGI Ref ID J:177037]
Poland A; Glover E. 1990. Characterization and strain distribution pattern of the murine Ah receptor specified by the Ahd and Ahb-3 alleles. Mol Pharmacol 38(3):306-12. [PubMed: 2169579] [MGI Ref ID J:34840]
Sangster MY; Heliams DB; MacKenzie JS; Shellam GR. 1993. Genetic studies of flavivirus resistance in inbred strains derived from wild mice: evidence for a new resistance allele at the flavivirus resistance locus (Flv). J Virol 67(1):340-7. [PubMed: 8380081] [MGI Ref ID J:3674]
Smith BK; Andrews PK; West DB. 2000. Macronutrient diet selection in thirteen mouse strains. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278(4):R797-805. [PubMed: 10749765] [MGI Ref ID J:61602]
Whitehead GS; Walker JK; Berman KG; Foster WM; Schwartz DA. 2003. Allergen-induced airway disease is mouse strain dependent. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 285(1):L32-42. [PubMed: 12626335] [MGI Ref ID J:84265]
Williams RW; Strom RC; Rice DS; Goldowitz D. 1996. Genetic and environmental control of variation in retinal ganglion cell number in mice. J Neurosci 16(22):7193-205. [PubMed: 8929428] [MGI Ref ID J:37203]
Ahrd relatedOas1bFlv-r relatedBenedict WF; Considine N; Nebert DW. 1973. Genetic differences in aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction and benzo(a)pyrene-produced tumorigenesis in the mouse. Mol Pharmacol 9(2):266-77. [PubMed: 4123113] [MGI Ref ID J:84312]
Boobis AR; Nebert DW. 1976. Genetic differences in the metabolism of carcinogens and in the binding of benzo (a) pyrene metabolites to DNA. Adv Enzyme Regul 15:339-62. [PubMed: 1030186] [MGI Ref ID J:12156]
Castro DJ; Lohr CV; Fischer KA; Pereira CB; Williams DE. 2008. Lymphoma and lung cancer in offspring born to pregnant mice dosed with dibenzo[a,l]pyrene: the importance of in utero vs. lactational exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 233(3):454-8. [PubMed: 18848954] [MGI Ref ID J:143604]
Chang C; Smith DR; Prasad VS; Sidman CL; Nebert DW; Puga A. 1993. Ten nucleotide differences, five of which cause amino acid changes, are associated with the Ah receptor locus polymorphism of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice. Pharmacogenetics 3(6):312-21. [PubMed: 8148872] [MGI Ref ID J:17460]
Curran CP; Miller KA; Dalton TP; Vorhees CV; Miller ML; Shertzer HG; Nebert DW. 2006. Genetic differences in lethality of newborn mice treated in utero with coplanar versus non-coplanar hexabromobiphenyl. Toxicol Sci 89(2):454-64. [PubMed: 16291824] [MGI Ref ID J:113285]
Felton JS; Nebert DW. 1975. Mutagenesis of certain activated carcinogens in vitro associated with genetically mediated increases in monooxygenase activity and cytochrome P 1-450. J Biol Chem 250(17):6769-78. [PubMed: 808546] [MGI Ref ID J:5564]
Gielen JE; Goujon FM; Nebert DW. 1972. Genetic regulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. II. Simple Mendelian expression in mouse tissues in vivo. J Biol Chem 247(4):1125-37. [PubMed: 4110756] [MGI Ref ID J:84250]
Goujon FM; Nebert DW; Gielen JE. 1972. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. IV. Interaction of various compounds with different forms of cytochrome P-450 and the effect on benzo(a)pyrene metabolism in vitro. Mol Pharmacol 8(6):667-80. [PubMed: 4118365] [MGI Ref ID J:84252]
Harper PA; Golas CL; Okey AB. 1991. Ah receptor in mice genetically nonresponsive for cytochrome P4501A1 induction: cytosolic Ah receptor, transformation to the nuclear binding state, and induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase by halogenated and nonhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons in embryonic tissues and cells. Mol Pharmacol 40(5):818-26. [PubMed: 1658612] [MGI Ref ID J:2134]
Kerley-Hamilton JS; Trask HW; Ridley CJ; Dufour E; Lesseur C; Ringelberg CS; Moodie KL; Shipman SL; Korc M; Gui J; Shworak NW; Tomlinson CR. 2012. Inherent and benzo[a]pyrene-induced differential aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling greatly affects life span, atherosclerosis, cardiac gene expression, and body and heart growth in mice. Toxicol Sci 126(2):391-404. [PubMed: 22228805] [MGI Ref ID J:183715]
Kouri RE; Rude TH; Joglekar R; Dansette PM; Jerina DM; Atlas SA; Owens IS; Nebert DW. 1978. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin as cocarcinogen causing 3-methylcholanthrene-initiated subcutaneous tumors in mice genetically 'nonresponsive' at Ah locus. Cancer Res 38(9):2777-83. [PubMed: 679184] [MGI Ref ID J:84318]
Levova K; Moserova M; Nebert DW; Phillips DH; Frei E; Schmeiser HH; Arlt VM; Stiborova M. 2012. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase expression in Cyp1a-knockout and CYP1A-humanized mouse lines and its effect on bioactivation of the carcinogen aristolochic acid I. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 265(3):360-7. [PubMed: 22982977] [MGI Ref ID J:192865]
Lew BJ; Manickam R; Lawrence BP. 2011. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor during pregnancy in the mouse alters mammary development through direct effects on stromal and epithelial tissues. Biol Reprod 84(6):1094-102. [PubMed: 21270426] [MGI Ref ID J:173706]
Moriguchi T; Motohashi H; Hosoya T; Nakajima O; Takahashi S; Ohsako S; Aoki Y; Nishimura N; Tohyama C; Fujii-Kuriyama Y; Yamamoto M. 2003. Distinct response to dioxin in an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-humanized mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(10):5652-7. [PubMed: 12730383] [MGI Ref ID J:132380]
Nebert DW; Atlas SA; Guenthner TM; Kouri RE. 1978. The Ah locus: genetic regulation of the enzymes which metabolize polycyclic hydrocarbons and the risk of cancer. In: Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and Cancer: Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Environment. Academic Press, New York. [MGI Ref ID J:30693]
Nebert DW; Considine N; Owens IS. 1973. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. VI. Control of other aromatic hydrocarbon-inducible mono-oxygenase activities at or near the same genetic locus. Arch Biochem Biophys 157(1):148-59. [PubMed: 4716952] [MGI Ref ID J:84313]
Nebert DW; Gelboin HV. 1969. The in vivo and in vitro induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase in mammalian cells of different species, tissues, strains, and developmental and hormonal states. Arch Biochem Biophys 134(1):76-89. [PubMed: 4981257] [MGI Ref ID J:84248]
Nebert DW; Gielen JE. 1972. Genetic regulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in the mouse. Fed Proc 31(4):1315-25. [PubMed: 4114109] [MGI Ref ID J:5282]
Nebert DW; Gielen JE; Goujon FM. 1972. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. 3. Changes in the binding of n-octylamine to cytochrome P-450. Mol Pharmacol 8(6):651-66. [PubMed: 4118364] [MGI Ref ID J:84251]
Nebert DW; Goujon FM; Gielen JE. 1972. Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction by polycyclic hydrocarbons: simple autosomal dominant trait in the mouse. Nat New Biol 236(65):107-10. [PubMed: 4502804] [MGI Ref ID J:84249]
Nebert DW; Jensen NM. 1979. Benzo[a]pyrene-initiated leukemia in mice. Association with allelic differences at the Ah locus. Biochem Pharmacol 28(1):149-51. [PubMed: 758905] [MGI Ref ID J:6074]
Nebert DW; Jensen NM; Shinozuka H; Kunz HW; Gill TJ 3rd. 1982. The Ah phenotype. Survey of forty-eight rat strains and twenty inbred mouse strains. Genetics 100(1):79-87. [PubMed: 7095422] [MGI Ref ID J:6809]
Nebert DW; Kon H. 1973. Genetic regulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. V. Specific changes in spin state of cytochrome P 450 from genetically responsive animals. J Biol Chem 248(1):169-78. [PubMed: 4348203] [MGI Ref ID J:84311]
Nebert DW; Robinson JR; Niwa A; Kumaki K; Poland AP. 1975. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in the mouse. J Cell Physiol 85(2 Pt 2 Suppl 1):393-414. [PubMed: 1091656] [MGI Ref ID J:84317]
Niwa A; Kumaki K; Nebert DW; Poland AP. 1975. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in the mouse. Distinction between the 'responsive' homozygote and heterozygote at the Ah locus. Arch Biochem Biophys 166(2):559-64. [PubMed: 1119809] [MGI Ref ID J:84316]
Oesch F; Morris N; Daly JW. 1973. Genetic expression of the induction of epoxide hydrase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activities in the mouse by phenobarbital or 3-methylcholanthrene. Mol Pharmacol 9(5):629-6. [PubMed: 4788156] [MGI Ref ID J:25852]
Okey AB; Vella LM; Harper PA. 1989. Detection and characterization of a low affinity form of cytosolic Ah receptor in livers of mice nonresponsive to induction of cytochrome P1-450 by 3-methylcholanthrene. Mol Pharmacol 35(6):823-30. [PubMed: 2543914] [MGI Ref ID J:27899]
Poel WE; Stanton D; Peters E; Wade HO. 1958. Comparative susceptibilities of seven inbred strains of mice to qualified applications of 3, 4-benzpyrene Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2:335. [MGI Ref ID J:84245]
Poland A; Bradfield C. 1992. A brief review of the Ah locus. Tohoku J Exp Med 168(2):83-7. [PubMed: 1339107] [MGI Ref ID J:12546]
Poland A; Glover E. 1990. Characterization and strain distribution pattern of the murine Ah receptor specified by the Ahd and Ahb-3 alleles. Mol Pharmacol 38(3):306-12. [PubMed: 2169579] [MGI Ref ID J:34840]
Poland A; Glover E; Kende AS. 1976. Stereospecific, high affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by hepatic cytosol. Evidence that the binding species is receptor for induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. J Biol Chem 251(16):4936-46. [PubMed: 956169] [MGI Ref ID J:84247]
Poland A; Glover E; Taylor BA. 1987. The murine Ah locus: a new allele and mapping to chromosome 12. Mol Pharmacol 32(4):471-8. [PubMed: 2823093] [MGI Ref ID J:8895]
Poland A; Palen D; Glover E. 1994. Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol Pharmacol 46(5):915-21. [PubMed: 7969080] [MGI Ref ID J:22144]
Poland A; Teitelbaum P; Glover E; Kende A. 1989. Stimulation of in vivo hepatic uptake and in vitro hepatic binding of [125I]2-lodo-3,7,8-trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by the administration of agonist for the Ah receptor. Mol Pharmacol 36(1):121-7. [PubMed: 2546046] [MGI Ref ID J:126377]
Poland AP; Glover E; Robinson JR; Nebert DW. 1974. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity. Induction of monooxygenase activities and cytochrome P1-450 formation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in mice genetically 'nonresponsive' to other aromatic hydrocarbons. J Biol Chem 249(17):5599-606. [PubMed: 4370044] [MGI Ref ID J:84314]
Quintana FJ; Basso AS; Iglesias AH; Korn T; Farez MF; Bettelli E; Caccamo M; Oukka M; Weiner HL. 2008. Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 453(7191):65-71. [PubMed: 18362915] [MGI Ref ID J:136052]
Robinson JR; Considine N; Nebert DW. 1974. Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction. Evidence for the involvement of other genetic loci. J Biol Chem 249(18):5851-9. [PubMed: 4413562] [MGI Ref ID J:84315]
Schmid FA; Demetriades MS; Schabel FM 3rd; Tarnowski GS. 1967. Toxicity of several cancerigenic polycyclic hydrocarbons and other agents in AKR and C57BL-6 mice. Cancer Res 27(3):563-7. [PubMed: 6021514] [MGI Ref ID J:84246]
Schmid FA; Elmer I; Tarnowski GS. 1969. Genetic determination of differential inflammatory reactivity and subcutaneous tumor susceptibility of AKR-J and C57BL-6J mice to 7,12-dimethylbenz- [a]anthracene. Cancer Res 29(8):1585-9. [PubMed: 5807232] [MGI Ref ID J:34134]
Schmid FA; Pena RC; Robinson W; Tarnowski GS. 1967. Toxicity of intraperitoneal injections of 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene in inbred mice. Cancer Res 27(3):558-62. [PubMed: 6021513] [MGI Ref ID J:26440]
Schmidt JV; Carver LA; Bradfield CA. 1993. Molecular characterization of the murine Ahr gene. Organization, promoter analysis, and chromosomal assignment. J Biol Chem 268(29):22203-9. [PubMed: 8408082] [MGI Ref ID J:15153]
Shi Z; Chen Y; Dong H; Amos-Kroohs RM; Nebert DW. 2008. Generation of a 'humanized' hCYP1A1_1A2_Cyp1a1/1a2(-/-)_Ahrd mouse line harboring the poor-affinity aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376(4):775-80. [PubMed: 18814841] [MGI Ref ID J:141523]
Shivanna B; Zhang W; Jiang W; Welty SE; Couroucli XI; Wang L; Moorthy B. 2013. Functional deficiency of aryl hydrocarbon receptor augments oxygen toxicity-induced alveolar simplification in newborn mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 267(3):209-17. [PubMed: 23337360] [MGI Ref ID J:193493]
Simonian PL; Wehrmann F; Roark CL; Born WK; O'Brien RL; Fontenot AP. 2010. gammadelta T cells protect against lung fibrosis via IL-22. J Exp Med 207(10):2239-53. [PubMed: 20855496] [MGI Ref ID J:165803]
Smith AG; Clothier B; Robinson S; Scullion MJ; Carthew P; Edwards R; Luo J; Lim CK; Toledano M. 1998. Interaction between iron metabolism and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in mice with variants of the Ahr gene: a hepatic oxidative mechanism. Mol Pharmacol 53(1):52-61. [PubMed: 9443932] [MGI Ref ID J:45850]
Stiborova M; Levova K; Barta F; Shi Z; Frei E; Schmeiser HH; Nebert DW; Phillips DH; Arlt VM. 2012. Bioactivation versus detoxication of the urothelial carcinogen aristolochic acid I by human cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1A2. Toxicol Sci 125(2):345-58. [PubMed: 22086975] [MGI Ref ID J:183662]
Tanos R; Murray IA; Smith PB; Patterson A; Perdew GH. 2012. Role of the ah receptor in homeostatic control of Fatty Acid synthesis in the liver. Toxicol Sci 129(2):372-9. [PubMed: 22696238] [MGI Ref ID J:188164]
Taylor BA. 1971. Strain distribution and linkage tests of 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) inflammatory response in mice. Life Sci I 10(19):1127-34. [PubMed: 5132702] [MGI Ref ID J:5244]
Thomas PE; Hutton JJ; Taylor BA. 1973. Genetic relationship between aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase inducibility and chemical carcinogen induced skin ulceration in mice. Genetics 74(4):655-9. [PubMed: 4750810] [MGI Ref ID J:5387]
Thomas PE; Kouri RE; Hutton JJ. 1972. The genetics of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in mice: a single gene difference between C57BL-6J and DBA-2J. Biochem Genet 6(2):157-68. [PubMed: 4666754] [MGI Ref ID J:31977]
Thorgeirsson SS; Nebert DW. 1977. The Ah locus and the metabolism of chemical carcinogens and other foreign compounds. Adv Cancer Res 25:149-93. [PubMed: 405846] [MGI Ref ID J:5822]
Walisser JA; Bunger MK; Glover E; Bradfield CA. 2004. Gestational exposure of Ahr and Arnt hypomorphs to dioxin rescues vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(47):16677-82. [PubMed: 15545609] [MGI Ref ID J:94465]
Yeager RL; Reisman SA; Aleksunes LM; Klaassen CD. 2009. Introducing the 'TCDD-inducible AhR-Nrf2 gene battery'. Toxicol Sci 111(2):238-46. [PubMed: 19474220] [MGI Ref ID J:154083]
Yu Z; Mahadevan B; Lohr CV; Fischer KA; Louderback MA; Krueger SK; Pereira CB; Albershardt DJ; Baird WM; Bailey GS; Williams DE. 2006. Indole-3-carbinol in the maternal diet provides chemoprotection for the fetus against transplacental carcinogenesis by the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon dibenzo[a,l]pyrene. Carcinogenesis 27(10):2116-23. [PubMed: 16704990] [MGI Ref ID J:113356]
Bhatt PN; Jacoby RO. 1976. Genetic resistance to lethal flavivrus encephalitis. II. Effect of immunosuppression. J Infect Dis 134(2):166-73. [PubMed: 787445] [MGI Ref ID J:5691]
Brinton MA; Arnheiter H; Haller O. 1982. Interferon independence of genetically controlled resistance to flaviviruses. Infect Immun 36(1):284-8. [PubMed: 6176543] [MGI Ref ID J:6761]
Darnell MB; Koprowski H; Lagerspetz K. 1974. Genetically determined resistance to infection with group B arboviruses. I. Distribution of the resistance gene among various mouse populations and characteristics of gene expression in vivo. J Infect Dis 129(3):240-7. [PubMed: 4816304] [MGI Ref ID J:5424]
Goodman GT; Koprowski H. 1962. Study of the mechanism of innate resistance to virus infection. J Cell Comp Physiol 59:333-73. [PubMed: 13900303] [MGI Ref ID J:14886]
Green MC. 1979. Flv Mouse News Lett 60:29. [MGI Ref ID J:13784]
Groschel D; Koprowski H. 1965. Development of a virus-resistant inbred mouse strain for the study of innate resistance to Arbo B viruses. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 17(3):379-91. [PubMed: 5882818] [MGI Ref ID J:14945]
Hanson B; Koprowski H; Baron S; Buckler CE. 1969. Interferon-mediated natural resistance of mice to arbo B virus infection Microbios 1B:51-68. [MGI Ref ID J:30761]
Perelygin AA; Scherbik SV; Zhulin IB; Stockman BM; Li Y; Brinton MA. 2002. Positional cloning of the murine flavivirus resistance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(14):9322-7. [PubMed: 12080145] [MGI Ref ID J:77001]
Sabin AB. 1952. Nature of inherited resistance to viruses affecting the nervous system Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 38(6):540-46. [PubMed: 16589143] [MGI Ref ID J:15009]
Scherbik SV; Kluetzman K; Perelygin AA; Brinton MA. 2007. Knock-in of the Oas1b(r) allele into a flavivirus-induced disease susceptible mouse generates the resistant phenotype. Virology 368(2):232-7. [PubMed: 17904183] [MGI Ref ID J:175365]
Smith AL; Jacoby RO; Bhatt PN. 1980. Genetic resistance to lethal flavivirus infection: Detection of interfering virus produced in vivo. In: Genetic Control of Natural Resistance to Infection and Malignancy. Academic Press, New York. [MGI Ref ID J:30727]
Stoddart CW; Martin-Iverson MT; Jablensky A; Urosevi N. 2004. A novel mouse Chr5 locus Diht controls dopamine-induced hypothermia. Mamm Genome 15(11):901-13. [PubMed: 15672594] [MGI Ref ID J:94070]
Urosevic N; Silvia OJ; Sangster MY; Mansfield JP; Hodgetts SI ; Shellam GR. 1999. Development and characterization of new flavivirus-resistant mouse strains bearing Flv(r)-like and Flv(mr) alleles from wild or wild-derived mice. J Gen Virol 80(Pt 4):897-906. [PubMed: 10211958] [MGI Ref ID J:54414]
Animal Health Reports
Room Number AX1
Room Number MP19
Colony Maintenance
Mating System Sibling x Sibling (Female x Male) 01-MAR-06 Breeding Considerations This strain is a challenging breeder. Diet Information LabDiet® 5K54
| Pricing for USA, Canada and Mexico shipping destinations |
|
Level 3. Up to 50 mice. Larger quantities or custom orders arranged upon request.
| Pricing for International shipping destinations |
|
Level 3. Up to 50 mice. Larger quantities or custom orders arranged upon request.
| phone: | 207-288-6470 |
| fax: | 207-288-6655 |
MICE, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”. JACKSON EXTENDS NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, WITH RESPECT TO MICE, PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
In case of dissatisfaction for a valid reason and claimed in writing by a purchaser within ninety (90) days of receipt of mice, products or services, JACKSON will, at its option, provide credit or replacement for the mice or product received or the services provided.
In no event shall JACKSON, its trustees, directors, officers, employees, and affiliates be liable for any causes of action or damages, including any direct, indirect, special, or consequential damages, arising out of the provision of MICE, PRODUCTS or services, including economic damage or injury to property and lost profits, and including any damage arising from acts or negligence on the part of JACKSON, its agents or employees. Unless prohibited by law, in purchasing or receiving MICE, PRODUCTS or services from JACKSON, purchaser or recipient, or any party claiming by or through them, expressly releases and discharges JACKSON from all such causes of action or damages, and further agrees to defend and indemnify JACKSON from any costs or damages arising out of any third party claims.
MICE and PRODUCTS are to be used in a safe manner and in accordance with all applicable governmental rules and regulations.
The foregoing represents the General Terms and Conditions applicable to JACKSON’s MICE, PRODUCTS or services. In addition, special terms and conditions of sale of certain MICE, PRODUCTS or services may be set forth separately in JACKSON web pages, catalogs, price lists, contracts, and/or other documents, and these special terms and conditions shall also govern the sale of these MICE, PRODUCTS and services by JACKSON, and by its licensees and distributors.
Acceptance of delivery of MICE, PRODUCTS or services shall be deemed agreement to these terms and conditions. No purchase order or other document transmitted by purchaser or recipient that may modify the terms and conditions hereof, shall be in any way binding on JACKSON, and instead the terms and conditions set forth herein, including any special terms and conditions set forth separately, shall govern the sale of MICE, PRODUCTS or services by JACKSON.